Skip to content
DefiTier logoDefiTier
Farm now
📐 DefiTier Scoring Standard 2.0

Methodology & Evaluation Model

How DefiTier objectively scores perpetual DEXes, calculates tier rankings (S/A/B/C/D), and safeguards farmer capital. The farm score is a weighted sum of six public inputs. No venue can pay to move it, and every input is visible on the venue's own page. The rule that moves the list most: any program more than 80% through its window caps at Tier B, because arriving at the end of a season is not farming.

🔒
100% Unpaid Rankings

No DEX or protocol can pay to alter its score, boost its tier, or influence editorial parameters.

📊
Public & Reproducible

Every score input is derived from public smart contract data, verified tokenomics, and public volume feeds.

🛡️
Fee-Drag Protection

Penalizes venues with predatory fees or diluted late-stage farming seasons to prevent capital loss.

Methodology

The formula, in full

Six factors, each normalised to a 0-100 scale and then weighted. Everything is derived from public data or from editorial fields printed on the venue page, so any score here can be reproduced by hand.
30%

Reward size & density

Estimated reward pool (est. FDV × community allocation) divided by daily venue volume, log-scaled between $1k and $500k of pool per $1M of daily volume, then blended 70/30 with the absolute size of the pool. Density alone would rank a venue with a $5M pool above Polymarket, which is nonsense — a great ratio on a tiny pool still pays very little. Scaled down when a program is not primarily volume-weighted, and again when FDV or allocation is our estimate rather than a published figure.

20%

Entry window

How much of the published program is still ahead of you. A program that ends in six weeks has already allocated most of its point supply, so joining now buys a slice of what is left — that is a late entry, not a farm, and the score says so. Venues that have not started a program yet score highest here because there are no existing point holders to dilute you, and venues whose seasons reset get a floor because a fresh season resets the competition.

20%

Airdrop credibility

Starts from how committed the venue is — confirmed token and date, official intent with a published allocation, a running program with no numbers, or nothing but third-party speculation — then scaled by stage, so a live points program outranks a retroactive hope.

20%

Room to farm

Penalises absolute size (log-scaled from $5M to $15B of daily volume), venue maturity, and turnover above 4x open interest per day, which is where volume stops being positioning and starts being churn. Venues under $3M a day take a further penalty: cheap to dominate, but they may never pay anything.

5%

Fee efficiency

Taker fee in basis points, scaled linearly across the 1-10 bps band where real perp fees sit, and shown on each venue page as the dollar cost of a $100k round trip. Fees are the price of points, and the funding screener exists because funding usually moves that cost more than the fee schedule does.

5%

Capital momentum

Seven-day open-interest change dominates, with a small weight on 24h volume change. Rising open interest means capital is arriving and staying; a volume spike with flat open interest means farmers are churning and diluting the pool you are farming.

Classification

Tier Definitions & Expected Yields

How protocols are grouped into tiers based on their final composite score (0-100).
SScore: 80 - 100

Tier S

Early programs with the largest pool per dollar of volume. Farm these first.

AScore: 65 - 79

Tier A

Strong programs with credible commitments and room left to farm.

BScore: 50 - 64

Tier B

Solid but either crowded, late, or vaguer about allocation.

CScore: 35 - 49

Tier C

Speculative or well past the halfway point of the program.

DScore: < 35

Tier D

Nothing committed, thin numbers, or a program that is nearly over.

TGEScore: < 35

Post-TGE

Token launched or no program at all. Kept as precedent and liquidity reference.

Risk Controls

Tier boundaries and the caps

Score floors start at S≥60, A≥52, B≥44 and C≥36. The letter you see is then assigned by score rank among farmable venues: about 28% S, 18% A, 18% B, 22% C, rest D — so Tier S stays a wide top band and B does not swallow the mid-pack. Hard gates still apply: Tier S needs open interest of about $2M plus live volume; rumored books cannot sit in S. Caps on top of the formula:
  • Thin or missing OI caps at Tier B.

    No indexed open interest, or OI under about $2M, or no live volume: score is capped below A (Tier B at best), even when volume aggregators look busy.

  • Late programs cap at Tier B.

    Anything more than 80% through its farming window cannot rank higher, however good its volume looks — the point supply is already spoken for and you would be buying the last slice.

  • Unverifiable venues cap lower.

    No volume and no OI caps at Tier C. Rumored retroactive programs also cannot sit above B. A venue nobody indexes may be a great farm, but it should not outrank one whose numbers you can audit on public open-interest feeds.

  • Launched tokens are not graded at all.

    Venues whose token already exists, and venues with no program to speak of, carry a TGE badge and sit below the ranked field. There is no airdrop left to farm, so letting them occupy a tier would be misleading.

Ready to simulate your returns?

Use our interactive multi-mode calculator to model real airdrop payouts, volume requirements, and delta-neutral funding carry.

FAQ

Questions about the tier list

How often do tiers change?+
Scores recompute every five minutes with the underlying volume and open-interest data, so a venue can move between tiers within a day if its volume spikes or capital leaves. The editorial inputs — allocation percentage, credibility, fees — are reviewed weekly, and every venue page shows its own last-verified date.
Why is a venue with huge volume ranked below a small one?+
Because you are competing with that volume. A $2B-per-day venue splits its reward pool between everyone generating that volume, while a $30M-per-day venue with a comparable pool gives each dollar you trade a far larger share. Size only helps if the pool scales with it, and it usually does not.
Can a venue pay to be in Tier S?+
No. Tiers come out of the published formula using public data, and referral relationships carry zero weight. Referral links do fund the site, and they often reduce your trading fees, which improves your own economics without touching the ranking.
What makes a venue Tier D?+
Either nothing has been committed — no token, no allocation, no date, and no program to point at — or the program is so far along that the remaining point supply no longer justifies the fees. Venues whose token has already launched are not in Tier D at all; they leave the ranking entirely and sit in the Post-TGE group.
Why is a venue with a live program ranked below one with no program?+
Because a program that has been running for a year has a very large pool of existing point holders and you are joining at the back of the queue, while a venue that has not launched a program yet counts your early activity against no competition at all. The entry-window factor is what encodes that, and it is why the top of the list moves as programs age rather than staying static.